|
The following is an email campaign from Electric Royalties. We do not endorse any specific company, product, or service mentioned in this email. Our mission-critical information is sent each weekend and is separate, therefore unsubscribing from this email will also stop your Free Morgan Report subscription.
The All-In-One Play On Critical Metals
|
|
|
The electrification trend that was putting pressure on critical metals like copper, zinc, lithium, graphite, manganese, tin and vanadium was already one of the top investing themes in todayb s world.
Now the tariff war has turbocharged the entire sector, sending investors scrambling for the best plays.
Theyb ll find one perfectly positioned, all-in-one, critical metals bet b Electric Royalties (ELEC.V; ELECF.OTC) b a company that also happens to be severely undervalued in light of its upcoming cash flow.
|
|
|
Dear Fellow Investor,
The clean energy revolution is a long-term trend that will drive demand for critical metals for decades to come.
From copper to zinc, to graphite to vanadium, critical metals face either looming or ongoing supply deficits.
The price pressure that these deficits will put on these metals creates opportunity for investors.
As luck would have it, thereb s a unique and undervalued way to play the clean energy trend.
|
Itb s called Electric Royalties (ELEC.V; ELECF), the under-the-radar company that has quietly built its royalty portfolio in clean metals from 11 royalties to 43 royalties over the past five years.
|
If you want critical metals exposure and diversification, itb s hard to imagine anything better:
|
Electric Royaltiesb portfolio is spread across no less than nine critical metals and five continents. It also includes another 17 optioned properties that could be converted into royalties.
|
And then thereb s this: Despite the rapid-fire growth of this portfolio...and despite significant cash flow on the way... Electric Royalties is currently trading below its IPO levels five years ago.
As youb re about to see, thatb s a valuation mismatch that could soon resolve in a lucrative re-rating for nimble investors.
|
|
|
|
Significant Cash Flow On The Way
|
|
|
How undervalued is Electric Royalties and how much money could this royalty company produce?
Consider that just a fraction of the companyb s projects could generate about as much annual cash flow as the companyb s current market cap.
They include (1):
- Punitaqui (0.75% Gross Revenue Royalty): A copper-gold project that could produce between 19 million and 23 million pounds of copper a year. Electric is entitled to 0.75% of the annual revenues from the mine.
- Bisset Creek (1.5% GRR): This graphite project is projected to generate 33,183 tonnes of graphite annually. Once the project is in production, Electric is entitled to 1.5% of annual revenues.
- Battery Hill (2% Gross Metal Royalty): Battery Hills is a manganese project that could produce 68,000 tonnes of the metal a year. Once the project is in production, Electric is entitled to 2% of annual revenues.
- Kenbridge (0.5% GRR and 1% GRR on Kenbridge North): With projected annual production of 7.3 million pounds of nickel equivalent, Electricb s Kenbridge royalty entitles it to 0.5% of annual revenues from the project.
- Mont Sorcier (1% GMR on vanadium): This project could produce five million tonnes per year of vanadium. Once Mont Sorcier is in production, Electric is entitled to 1% of the annual revenues from the projectb s vanadium sales.
|
|
|
Click image to enlarge.
Electric Royalties has several royalties in its portfolio that could soon generate cash flow for the company.
|
|
|
These projects are in advanced stages of development and could come online anytime from this year to just a few years down the road.
In addition to Punitaqui, Electric Royalties has another four royalty projects (the Middle Tennessee Zinc mine, the Gramphada Graphite mine, the Penouta tin mine and the Authier Lithium Project) that could either recommence production or enter production for the first time this year.
|
|
|
|
The Big Advantage Of Royalty Companies
|
|
|
In providing one-stop exposure to nine critical metals, Electric Royalties offers investors all the advantages that come with being a royalty company.
Royalty companies do not operate mines or need large and highly specialized teams to operate.
Royalty companies offer turnkey diversification.
They offer lower risk than mining companies, as royalties are typically based on revenues and paid irrespective of profitability. Once the company buys the royalty, no further capital outlay is required.
|
And, most importantly for investors, the royalty/streaming business model has been proven to outperform mining companies during metals bull markets.
|
|
|
|
Management With Skin In The Game
|
|
|
If you want proof that the companyb s management truly believes Electric Royalties is undervalued, consider that it and high-net-worth investors have a ton of skin in the game.
The companyb s Founder and CEO, Brendan Yurik, and his extended family own 18% of Electricb s outstanding stock.
Noteworthy investor Stefan Gleason owns 28% of the company, and Globex Mining owns approximately 11%.
|
Just between Yurik and his family, Mr. Gleason and Globex Mining, these players account for roughly 57% of stock outstanding.
|
When you invest in a company in the junior mining sector, you want to do so with an investment group thatb s on your side. Thatb s very much the case with Electric Royalties.
|
|
|
|
Getting In Cheap Increases Profit Potential
|
|
|
Once again, despite the value Electric Royalties has added to its portfolio in the past five years, the companyb s shares have never been so heavily discounted.
This is true even though the company has a wealth of catalysts that could soon move its share price higher.
|
|
|
Click image to enlarge.
Electric Royalties has numerous upcoming catalysts that could drive its share price considerably higher over the next 12-15 months.
|
|
|
Those include immediate cash flow from Punitaqui, options payments from Electricb s lithium portfolio and advanced royalty payments from Bissett Creek.
They also include the near-term catalysts of the aforementioned mines that could come online this year, and the potential longer-term cash flow of a series of projects well along the development curve.
|
Bottom line: One of the hottest sectors in the market just got hotter...yet one of the single best and most leveraged plays is temporarily mired in near all-time lows.
|
Opportunities like this come rarely. If you want to make a diversified wager on the growing global demand for critical metals, youb ll want to start doing your homework on Electric Royalties now, before the upcoming catalysts can spark a rerating.
|
|
|
CLICK HERE
To Learn More about Electric Royalties and the Projects Referenced
|
|
|
1. Projected annual production from sources below:
- Punitaqui: full annual copper production rate projected at 19 million to 23 million pounds of copper in concentrate (Battery Mineral Resources Corp. news release dated May 13, 2024; Battery Mineral Resources Corp. website https://bmrcorp.com/projects/projects-map/)
- Bissett Creek: Northern Graphite Corporation Bissett Creek Project PEA; Leduc, M; Effective Date December 6, 2013; Further information and technical reports can be obtained through the Northern Graphite profile at sedarplus.ca or northerngraphite.com.
- Battery Hill: Technical report titled "NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Battery Hill Manganese Project, Woodstock, New Brunswick, Canada" with an effective date of May 12, 2022, available under Manganese X Energy Corp.'s profile on sedarplus.ca
- Kenbridge: Technical report titled b
Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Kenbridge Nickel Project, Kenora, Ontariob
with an effective date of July 6, 2022, available under Tartisan Nickel Corp.b s profile on sedarplus.ca
- Mont Sorcier: Technical report titled b
Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) for the Mont Sorcier Project b Quebec, Canada,b
effective date September 8, 2022 available under Voyager Metalsb profile on sedarplus.ca
PEAs are preliminary in nature and include Inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves as defined under NI 43-101 regulations for Canadian Public Companies. There is no certainty that the PEA will be realized. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
|
|
|
|
Warnings and Disclaimers: As you know, every investment entails risk. Trusted Causes LLC hasnb t researched and cannot assess the suitability of any investments mentioned or advertised by our advertisers. We recommend you conduct your own due diligence and consult with your financial adviser before entering into any type of financial investment. This profile should be viewed as a paid advertisement. The publisher and staff of this publication may hold positions in the
securities of companies discussed. The information contained herein has been received from sources which the publisher deems reliable. However, the publisher cannot guarantee that such information is complete and true in all respects. The advertiser provided a review of the content of this advertisement at the time of publication. The publisher is not a registered investment adviser and does not purport to offer personalized investment related advice. Each person must separately determine
whether such advice and recommendations are suitable and whether they fit within such personb s goals and portfolio. The advertiser featured in this edition of Trusted Causes LLC has paid the publisher for the costs and compensation related to the authorship, overhead, design, and/or distributing this email, in the amount of $300. This email includes certain statements that may be deemed "forward-looking statements." All statements in this email, other than statements of historical facts, that
address anticipated future events are forward-looking statements. Although the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements.
|
|
|
